Ceremony for Returning Troops Closes French Combat Mission in Afghanistan

  • Share
  • Read Later
JEFF PACHOUD / AFP / Getty Images

A French soldier on duty near Afghanistan's National Police Training Center in Wardak Province, Afghanistan, on Sept. 26, 2012

France took a major step toward winding down its activities in the NATO-led mission in Afghanistan on Dec. 8 with a ceremony for 153 returning combat soldiers — part of President François Hollande’s pledge to bring the nation’s fighting troops home by the end of 2012. Though the arrival of a final contingent of combat soldiers in France in the next few days will fully close that chapter, Saturday’s moving commemoration by French Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian thanking the nation’s military for the Afghan effort was designed to emphasize that France’s combat role has already drawn to an end.

“It’s with the sentiment of a duty fulfilled that you’re returning to France … [and] being reunited with those you love and have missed so much,” said Le Drian on a tarmac in Cyprus beside a government Airbus waiting to take the soldiers back to Paris. “This was the promise that the President of the Republic made to the French people. It’s a promise fulfilled.”

(MORE: France Recognizes Syria’s Opposition — Will the West Follow Suit?)

The significance of that pledge and the official gesture of accompanying them home were not lost on the returning soldiers.

“This ceremony makes it clear an important page has been turned, and that France’s political leaders and public have decided to end this operation the same way they began it — with their support and appreciation,” said Captain Kamel Essid, 33, eager to return to his wife and three children after seven months of combat duty that left five members of his unit dead. “Without echoing any party line, I can honestly say we did what was needed to help provide Afghanistan the breathing room, elected government and trained forces it needs to decide its future on its own. Now it’s time to let Afghanistan do that.”

Hollande’s move toward withdrawal required careful diplomatic and security balancing act. It defied claims by Hollande’s conservative foes who mocked his campaign vow with warnings that such a quick return was logistically impossible, would provoke anger from France’s remaining NATO allies and leave exiting forces vulnerable to Taliban assaults. Those things didn’t happen, and after a series of bruising domestic policy and p.r. setbacks that have sent Hollande’s approval rating sliding, his success in fulfilling his popular Afghan pledge should do his public support some good.

“We’ve finished the combat operation before year’s over, all our allies understood our position from the start, and though there were attacks during what was a long and slow withdrawal, there were no injuries,” Le Drian told TIME in Cyprus, needling the foresight of the opposition’s Cassandras. “The mission is accomplished.”

Most of it, anyway. If Hollande is making good on his pledge to bring French fighting forces home, he’s also made it clear to allies since announcing the combat contingent withdrawal — just two weeks after his May 6 election win — that France won’t be leaving NATO high and dry in Afghanistan.

Departed French troops leave behind 1,500 military personnel regrouped in Kabul. Roughly 1,000 of those will carry out logistical work — much of it linked to transporting vehicles and material back to France — through mid-2013. The other 500 will continue medical duties, managing the Kabul airport and training Afghan soldiers and officers until the current NATO mission mandate expires at the end of 2014. At that time, any continued presence will have to be renegotiated with the Afghan government and must be redefined in what leaders at the NATO summit in Chicago last May stressed would be noncombat in nature.

(MORE: The Problem with Clichy: After 2005 Riots, France’s Suburbs Are Still Miserable)

What extended role NATO countries might take once the U.S. finishes its withdrawal in 2014 is anyone’s guess. In fact, with public patience over the Afghan slog waning in many participating nations, French officials suspect their stepped-up combat departure may be soon be replicated by some allies. That thinking already seems to be prevalent among ground forces.

“We had very good relations and regular contacts with our American peers, and they fully understood the decision of [French] leaders — and related to our joy in going home now that the job is done,” said Essid. “I think everyone privately agrees it’s time to wind things down.”

A returning French lieutenant went even further. Under the agreement his name not be used, the soldier said there’s general consensus among NATO forces in Afghanistan that continued presence in the country may soon become counterproductive.

“Afghanistan now has the basic governmental and military structures it needs to determine its own future, and what we risk by staying now that’s in place is inflaming the eternal, notorious Afghan determination to chase the foreign invader out,” he said. “Most Afghans appreciate what we’ve done — especially in bringing medical care and aid that saved fathers, mothers, children who would have died otherwise. But Afghan resentment of the occupier runs strong and deep, and we’re in danger of awakening it by staying too long.”

For some, even sped-up departure may be too tardy. France’s participation in the 11-year NATO mission deployed an average 3,600 soldiers to Afghanistan at any time — and 4,000 at its peak in 2010. The rotation of forces over that period involved a total of 60,000 soldiers — 1 for every 1,000 French citizens. That duration and scope made the Afghan operation France’s largest military commitment since the Algerian war for independence. It also cost the country 88 of its troops and injured another 725.

That toll may seem minimal to countries like the U.S. and U.K., which have lost 2,145 and 438 service members respectively. But those fatalities will be the most vivid memories some French combatants take home from Afghanistan.

“There are a lot of things I’ll remember about that vast, impressive and captivating country, but the thing that will stay most with me from Afghanistan is the smell of death,” said Essid, who lost four comrades in June to a suicide bomber and another in August in a firefight. “Cold death, hot death, death in battle and death that came out of nowhere.”

“Enough death,” he said, sipping a glass of juice and smiling somewhere over the Mediterranean as the government Airbus sped him back to his family. “It’s time for life — for everyone getting back to life.”

MORE: Is Gay Marriage Too Progressive for the French?


All of a sudden, I try to tell myself how confused I am about the fighting in Afghanistan...NOT  just this latest highly advertised fighting of the past 10+ yrs (more?), in which the United Nations is (apparently?) calling the shots...

But I find myself thinking back to the 1940s (or '30s, or 50's?) when, it seems to me, that Great Britain was the sole invader/fighter of/for allied nations on Afghanistan's soil...what was that all about?  ...and so far as I know the fighting on Afghan soil by some foreigner has been near-continuous ever since (at least, during these years that I've been old enuf to be paying attention)!

Whattaya thinnk?  Am I misinformed?  Thank you  /s/zorus colglazier, pobox 1028, morro bay, ca


But 40,000 deaths in Syria are not enough for France.It is going out of the way to encourage the wahabised Sunni rebels there to continue their sectarian slaughter in the name of freedom,human rights and democracy.


We often make light of the French, but they are smarter than the U.S. when it comes to Afghanistan.


Bring the siblings back, France did well, USA did well etc, westerns did well to care about their siblings outside and inside, but sometime they should pay the same attention and compassion to the civilians in mid east such as syria , the red line shouldn't be no to gas sarin , should be no to slaughter at the begin of the conflict. 40.000 deaths estimated until now, they are the same as us, human beings.

meanwhile , there is several villages in northern thailand " Chinese village" so called, there are still around 4000 Chinese civilians stay there illegally without a nationalities. There are Chinese purely. Taiwan authority and mainland china authority , please also bring them back if it's possible. They are suffering for the basic daily demands by being isolated by the Thailand authority . I had been there, what they need is just a legel nationality , anybody was born to


JeffVanKirk Easy to post that kind of clichés. Less easy to go to the battle ground and check the facts for yourself Uh? Coward.


I have met many people who served with NATO forces.  The general consensus is that on a good day "the French and Italians will stay out of the way"  Good riddance.  The French won't be missed.


@JeffVanKirk  It appears the only reason the Americans will be missed is that we poured so much of our taxpayer money into their country. You can disavow these news reports of empty school buildings, clinics and roads to nowhere in the rugged terrain of Afghanistan. True or not? The WSJ ran a story earlier this yera about high-tech bases we've provided for the Afghan recruits, most of whom can't even count - much less use sophisticated equipment. Petraeus symbolizes that war: phony (another writer's words), deceptive and corrupt (abuse of American taxpayers' money).

JoanEli like.author.displayName 1 Like

End of Expedition which was nothing but wasting precious lives of our troops and resources for a record corrupt Afgan govt.

StephenSwain like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

"Whatever", uttered with infinite tiredness, sounds about right.  All the Westerners need to ease on out of there.  Whatever the Afghanis, who are not really one coherent society, can make of each other and of their disputed/shared resources, so much the better.  It will be horrible for all the little girls and boys who want an education,  and for all the women who don't want to be chattel.  But it's time for us to go.  History has won again.  Time for Afghanis to do what they can with what they have.