Why the E.U. Blacklisted Hizballah’s Military Wing but Not Hizballah Itself

  • Share
  • Read Later
Sharif Harim / REUTERS

Center: Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, escorted by his bodyguards, greets his supporters at an anti-U.S. protest in Beirut's southern suburbs, on Sep. 17, 2012

Drawing a distinction that Hizballah itself does not, the foreign ministers of the 28 member states of the E.U. on Monday voted to list the Lebanese Islamist group’s military wing as a terrorist organization, while leaving unaffected what the E.U. called the political wing of the Lebanese militia. The decision challenged the group’s organizational understanding of itself, as described by Hizballah’s second-in-command during a speech last October: “We don’t have a military wing and a political one,” Naim Qassem declared in Beirut. “We don’t have Hizballah on one hand and the resistance party on the other. Every element of Hizballah, from commanders to members as well as our various capabilities, are in the service of the resistance and we have nothing but the resistance as a priority,” Qassem said.

Be that as it may, the E.U. found it useful to detect a distinction. Ever since Hizballah operatives were linked to the July 2012 bombing of a tourist bus filled with Israeli tourists in Bulgaria, an E.U. member state, the E.U. has been under pressure to join the U.S. in designating the organization a terrorist group. The pressure only increased when Cyprus, another E.U. country, put on trial a Swedish-Lebanese man who described working for Hizballah; his duties included scouting Israeli tourists for possible attacks in the Mediterranean nation, he said in court.

But under E.U. rules, all 28 member states would have to agree to designate Hizballah a terrorist organization, and it was clear that not all would. So a compromise was found — one that suits the political reality of the situation if not the physical one. “I think it’s a political move,” says Benedetta Berti, an expert on Hizballah at the Institute for National Security Studies, a Tel Aviv think tank. Hizballah, which was formed by Iran in the early 1980s to fight Israeli forces that had invaded Lebanon, is patently a military organization. It has planned and carried out highly disciplined terrorist attacks and has mustered uniformed forces en masse, including reportedly sending in battalions of fighters across the border to Syria to aid the embattled regime of President Bashar Assad.

But it is also a political party, one prominent in the coalition that governs Lebanon. Proscribing the whole of Hizballah as a terrorist group would make it very difficult for the E.U. to deal with, say, the Lebanese parliament, according to Berti. “Then any type of political, bilateral cooperation would be risky, because it could be challenged on the grounds that the government includes terrorists,” she says. “The people who decided to take this route are not naive.”

Another reported concern was the safety of European troops serving in the U.N. peacekeeping force assigned to the buffer zone between Israel and Lebanon. Nations with soldiers wearing blue helmets were concerned that their troops might be vulnerable to reprisals if Hizballah had been designated a terrorist group. Others were concerned about becoming vulnerable to possible reprisal attacks inside their own nations, says Jonathan Spyer, a fellow at IDC Herzliya’s Global Research in International Affairs Center, north of Tel Aviv. “It’s kind of wonderfully paradoxical,” Spyer says. “They fear calling Hizballah a terrorist organization for fear it’ll carry out a terrorist attack.”

As it stands, the group will remain free to do what it has been doing in Europe — mostly, raising money. Hizballah fundraising on the continent, and especially in Germany, is so crucial to the group that Hassan Nasrallah, the charismatic cleric who sits atop the organization, has warned that being designated a terrorist group “would dry up the sources of finance, end moral, political and material support, stifle voices.”

Instead, the E.U. decision states that “legitimate financial transfers” will be allowed to continue, according to Agence France-Presse, with the burden of proving they are intended for terror activities apparently falling upon law enforcement. At that point, funds can be frozen, and individuals denied visas to enter Europe.

“For sure this is a very bad day for Hizballah,” says Spyer. “But it leaves a very large loophole.”

It might also be a loophole that will eventually be snugged tight by events. “Basically, with [the Palestinian extremist group] Hamas there was the same distinction drawn between the military wing and the political wing,” Berti notes. “At the peak of the second intifadeh the E.U. decided the distinction wasn’t valid anymore and combined the two. So there’s that precedent.”

16 comments
DovShalit
DovShalit

By differentiating between "political" Hizballah and "military" Hizballah, the EU is awarding a terrorist organization with an accommodation that no country on earth gets: there is no embargo on the Iranian nuclear program alone; there is an embargo on that country. The UN security council would never censure an army, such as the IDF, but it would and did censure countries, such as Israel.

One can't help but wonder why the EU would insist on keeping relations with an organization so closely tied with Syria and Iran, while allegedly acting to stop the aggressive actions of those countries.

EarthView
EarthView like.author.displayName 1 Like

@DovShalit To be consistent, EU should label IDF and Mossad as terrorist organizations. Since you are asking for consistency, you should agree but I am sure you will not.

UnchartedForest
UnchartedForest

Some not so distant time ago, these Europeans would make a lot of distinction between the Nazi Party and the Waffen-SS that got their orders from the Party..

EarthView
EarthView like.author.displayName 1 Like

This is a farce. Gutless Europeans are the prisoners of the U.S. and Israel. Let them label everybody terrorist when we all know that Israel is the biggest terrorist state in the world. 

jj.wyndham
jj.wyndham

One other thing... do Israeli leaders and media types have to take a special course on how to pronounce 'Hamas' and 'HisssBalllluh'?  The phlegm thing merely reveals the speaker's vulgarity, contrary to the obvious goal of demonizing either group.

jj.wyndham
jj.wyndham

For those predatory Israel deems enemies, having military capability is more about self-preservation than anything else.  Israel can identify with that, right?  Why shouldn't Lebanon have the right to defend itself?  Israel's allegations = 'proven guilty', as far as our untrustworthy media is concerned.  Sadly, once-venerable TIME is no exception.

DovShalit
DovShalit

@jj.wyndham 

To say that Hizballah is Lebanon is equivalent to saying that Al-Qayda is Pakistan or the the KKK is the US. Every country should have the right do defend itself and that is why there are armies. Hizballah does not act on behalf of Lebanon or its people; Nasrallah gets his orders and support from Tehran, not Beirut.

jj.wyndham
jj.wyndham

@DovShalit

Uh huh.  You know what Dov?  I'm not willing to take your word for it.  Bald assertion never spawned a single fact, and the former is all you've got.  Everything we get about the Middle East is propaganda that has to pass through the Israel filter before it ever lands in front of any of us stupid goy, whose opinions are policed by the likes of you, on every media site the world over.  What, EXACTLY, is Al-Qaeda (the spelling du jour)?  Are they the 9/11 bad guys in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq, or are they our allies, who we happen to be supplying with western arms so they can kill in Syria?

And we're supposed to believe Iran is evil because Israel claims they want nuclear weapons.  As Bibi jumps up and down on the world stage trying to get everybody excited about the nuclear weapons he has been claiming Iran is "weeks away" from, for over TWENTY YEARS, there are still lots of folks around who remember how certain he was about Saddam's WMD's that weren't.  Then there's the mind-numbing hypocrisy of western powers ignoring Israel's KNOWN nuclear arsenal, that everybody pretends isn't there!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpQdg4D78Jc

PanSlavek
PanSlavek

entire  state of israel next 

cjh2nd
cjh2nd

politicians trying to have their cake and eat it too. nothing new here.