The New Princess Diana Revelations: How Conspiracy Theories Still Haunt Her Death

Sixteen years after her car crash in Paris, there's another round of speculation that the Princess's death was no accident. Don't believe it

  • Share
  • Read Later
Tim Graham / Getty Images

Newspaper headlines on Aug. 31, 1997, announcing the death of Princess Diana

These are golden days for conspiracy theorists. If you believed your government was spying on you, Edward Snowden’s revelations have shown you’re probably right. WikiLeaks and Bradley Manning laid bare a world in which the authorities routinely do one thing and say another. You may be paranoid, but they’re still out to get you — or at least to detain you at Heathrow Airport for questioning.

Now, just a week shy of 16 years since a Mercedes plowed into a pillar in the Pont de l’Alma tunnel on Aug. 31, 1997, depriving Britain of her People’s Princess and the young royals William and Harry of their mother, along comes a fresh allegation in the story that has generated more conspiracy theories than any other. Scotland Yard announced on Saturday that it is “scoping” new information about the Paris car crash that killed Diana, Princess of Wales and patron saint of conspiracy theorists. The claim surfaced during the trial of a member of Britain’s elite and secretive SAS army regiment; according to some reports, the estranged in-laws of a key witness told the military police that the witness had alleged SAS involvement in Diana’s death.

(MORE: How Diana Transformed Britain)

The circumstances of that death, though, have been exhaustively investigated, by the authorities in France and the U.K., most recently in the 90-day inquest at London’s Royal Courts of Justice that reached the conclusion in April 2008 that the Princess and her boyfriend Dodi Fayed had been “unlawfully killed.” The verdict highlighted the “gross negligence” of the driver Henri Paul, who died at the wheel and was found to have blood alcohol three times above the French legal limit, and of the paparazzi, whose reckless pursuit of the couple sparked the high-speed chase that ended in tragedy. But no matter how deep the probes or how expensive — the cost to British taxpayers of the police inquiry and inquest is estimated to have topped $20 million — skeptics continued to raise questions and rumors to swirl.

A quick Internet search reveals a plethora of sites devoted to “exposing” Diana’s murder. A large and vociferous online community remains convinced, despite evidence to the contrary presented to the inquest, that the Queen’s former daughter-in-law was pregnant with Fayed’s child, provoking nebulous rings of vested interest at the heart of the British establishment into ordering her assassination to protect the monarchy. The more lurid versions of the tale claim the crash itself never happened (the Mercedes was dented in a car crusher; the Princess hijacked in the tunnel, forced into a vehicle masquerading as an ambulance and slaughtered). A surprisingly persistent meme depicts Diana as the victim of giant shape-shifting lizards that secretly control Britain. There are queries raised too about how and when a white Fiat Uno came into contact with the Mercedes, leaving paint traces, or whether Paul’s blood toxicology tallies with what is known of his last movements and usual habits, or why Diana’s seat belt was found not to work.

(MORE: Why the Royal Baby Is Already a Global Figure)

These queries seem sensible enough, and if we’ve learned anything from the whistle-blowers, hackers and leakers, it’s that the authorities don’t always tell the truth. But we knew that already. We may be in greater danger of forgetting that the authorities often do tell the truth too. Sometimes things are exactly as they seem: President Obama was born in Hawaii and Diana died in an accident, a victim not of unseen malefactors but of a collision between her desire for a private life and public fascination with her private life.

Scotland Yard — itself seeking to restore public trust after the twin blows of the News Corp phone-hacking scandal and the Jimmy Savile sex-abuse revelations revealed its tendency to protect the establishment rather than question it — has no choice but to evaluate the information it has received. To fail to do so would spark new conspiracies. Yet to divert more taxpayer money into a new inquiry also risks criticism. Hence the Yard’s carefully worded statement, issued on Saturday night, which made clear: “This is not a reinvestigation.” Die-hard Diana conspiracists will be disappointed. They will always be disappointed.

MORE: Oh, Boy: Britain’s Newborn Royal Prince Gets Straight to Work

MORE: Princess Diana: Looking Back on the 15th Anniversary of Her Death

91 comments
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

As a physician let me perfectly clear, Catherine Meyer: 


Anaesthetising, intubating and ventilating Princess Diana in the ALMA tunnel was treatment that did not match the circumstances being faced by Dr. Jean Marc Martino and Anoud Derossi.  


Give me a credible explanation for Dr. Martino´s treatment of Princess Diana: Firstly leaving her in the Mecedes for 20  minutes after he arrived 17 minutes after the crash and secondly for his sedation and intubation of Diana immediately after her removal from the vehicle.  Princess Diana had a Glasgow Coma rating of 14 out of 14.

Princess Diana did not suffer a heart attack but a elektromechanical dissociation, the heart was beating - but she was pulsless for a few seconds. That is NOT cardiac arrest in the sense of ventricular fibrillation and as a anaesthesesist Dr. Martino would have been aware of that. Tapping is the requested requirement to trigger a heart beat. 

The other physicians on the scene , Drs Fuilla and Le Hot ,were never interviewed by the police and neither appeared at Scott Baker´s "thorough" Inquest. 

The intubation, ventilation and anaesthesation went on during a 36 MINUTES BLACK OUT BETWEEN THE ALMA TUNNEL AND THE SAMU BASE.  


But you don´t see any discrepancies or irregularities, Catherine Mayer ? Condescension and derogatory commentary are not compelling or convincing arguments. It´s your prerogative to promote and support the establishment on the basis of the lack of knowledge. 


AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

David Spedding, Sherad Cowper-Coles and Richard Dearlove, orchestrated the plot to assassinate Princess Diana in a premeditated vehicular homicide attack . It was executed by the MI6 in conjunction with the French DGSE/DST. The order came from Prince Philip. 

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

Why do you think that Scotland Yard are announcing a "new investigation" in to an old claim that was in the Crowns possession in 2011 ? Are you a complete idiot ? 

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

Catherine Meyer, you are promoting, repeating and supporting the establishments official lies. 


If you compare the documents the Jury saw with the documents the jury never saw - like oh, I dont know, Princess Diana´s autopsy report, Henry Pauls toxicology report, witness statements............for you are aware that critical evidence was withheld from the Inquest Jury, by Lord Scott Baker..............the conclusion is murder. Dr. Martino told dr Lejay two critical lies that sealed Princess Diana´s fate. All of this is documented in John Morgans Inquest Series, volume 2, section three: The Medical mistreatment of Princess Diana. Its evidence based doumentation - what you call conspiracy theories speculation and conjecture are established facts. 

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

This is not speculation or conjecture, Catherine Meyer, but facts:


Following the crash at 12:23 am, Princess Diana remained in the car for 37 minutes before being removed to an ambulance at 01:00 am. 

AT 12:32 am, two Paris Fire Service ambulances ( Nos 94 and 100 ) from the Malar Medical Emergency Center, arrived, WITH NO DOCTORS ONBOARD.  You don´t think its strange that a Medical Emergency Center sends two ambulances with no doctors, and remember, paramedics are not used in France. However its normal procedure to have an emergency physician onboard. Now please give me a credible explanation as to why proper procedures were not followed that night ?

Dr. Mailliez quikly handed over responsibility for Princess Diana, to Xavier Gourmelon, a Paris First Aid Instructor not a physician as claimed by Lord Scott Baker, who lied at the Inquest. 

Even though the SAMU ambulance left two minutes before the Sampeur Pompier, it arrived eight minutes after the Fire Service. 

The SAMU ambulance Necker 02, arrived, with Dr. Martino, anaesthetist-resuscitator, at the crash scene at 12:40 am. The Necker Hospital is 2.3 kilometers from the Alma Tunnel. The ambulance arrived 17 MINUTES AF THE CRASH.  After the Samu ambulance arrived, Princess Diana, waited in the Mercedes for another 20 minutes. 





AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

No emergency physicans in the Sampeur Pompier  ambulances, is this also a conspiracy, Catherine Mayer ? Are Xavier Gourmelon and Philippe Boyer also lying ? 


The SAMU ambulance arrived 17 minutes after the emergency call from the Necker Hospital 2.3 kilometers from the Alma Tunnel. This means that the ambualnce was travelling at 11.5 kph. This ambulance arrived at 12:40 .a.m. The Samu ambulance left two minutes before the French Fire Service ambulances with NO Emergency PHYSICIANS on board, it arrived eight minutes AFTER the Fire Service. Then they leave Princess Diana in the Mercedes for 37 minutes - a victim of a high speed crash. 


I am physician Catherine Meyer, and I can tell you, that I don´t care if the physician came from the Moon. No physician waits 37 minutes. No physician. This is not correct procedure. The true assassins are the ambulance doctors. Dr.. Martino did not treat Diana  - he mistreated her. 

Dr. Martino left Diana in the back of the ambulance, first removing her at 1.a.m. The crash occured at 12:23 a.m. She was in the ambulance at 1.06. Then Dr. Martino had her anaesthetised, intubated and ventilated which was not necessary because Diana had a Glasgow coma rating of 14 out of 15 and did not have trouble breathing. Is this also a lie, Catherine Meyer ? 


Drs Martino and Derossi deliberately lingered as long as they could in the Alma Tunnel, while they simultaneously pumped catecholamines into Diana, knowing it was harmful to her. And they withheld knowledge of a thoracic trauma from the Samu base. I have read the transcripts, Catherine Meyer. YOU LACK KNOWLEDGE OF THE CASE: 



AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

Corruption at Scotland Yard shows that Lord John Stevens, Lord Paul Condon and Sir David Veness colluded and lied repeatedly during their extensive inquest cross-examinations.  Stevens presided over one of the largest sham investigations in the history of British policing – Operation Paget.  An operation that the public believed was designed to investigate the Paris crash was instead used to cover up the truth of what occurred – protecting the perpetrators of the assassination of Princess Diana. 

Over the ensuing decade Scotland Yard carried out one of the biggest and most wide-reaching cover-ups in its history. Police Commissioners Paul Condon and John Stevens should have conducted a thorough investigation. Instead, they sought to prevent the truth of the Alma Tunnel car crash – the assassination of Princess Diana – from being revealed to the British public. Just 18 days after the crash Princess Diana’s lawyer, Victor Mishcon, presented to Paul Condon documentary evidence of Diana’s belief she would be killed in a car crash. Instead of investigating this, Condon locked the evidence in his office safe – and there it stayed for six years.

On the very day of the crash Condon and Veness deliberately appointed Jeffrey Rees – a corrupt officer – to head the investigation, even though he was not available and had a clear conflict of interest. Corruption at Scotland Yard exposes police corruption involving top police and you are telling me CATHERINE MEYER THAT I AM A CONSPIRACY NUT ? 

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

Catherine Meyer, you have no knowledge of the evidence based well established documentation substantiated in the transcripts and the documents the jury never saw. So you are not in a position to make any  informed conclusion. 

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

You wanna take me on, Catherine Mayer ? I´ll destroy you.

Read John Morgans Inquest Series on the assassination. This is a transcript from volume 2, section three on the medical mistreatment of Princess Diana:

"Coroner, Scott Baker: Summing up. Dr. Mailliez handed Diana over to the doctor in the fire rescue vehicles that arrived at 12:32 a.m.......Two vehicles attended. There were five people including paramedics, in each". 

Comment: These 27 words are the sum total of Baker´s coverage relating to the Fire Service, the Sampeur Pompiers, in his summing up. INCLUDED IN IT IS A DIRECT LIE: Scott Baker tells the Jury that Dr. Mailliez "handed Diana over to the doctor", but the truth is that there was NO doctor in present in the Fire service ambulance dispatched from the Maler MEDICAL service center and that was a theme of the French Service evidence. Gourmelon (  Fire Service Aid Instructer ) confirmed that there was NO physician in his vehicle and Boyer confirmed, that there was NO physician in his vehicle.
WHY WOULD A MEDICAL CENTER DISPATCH TWO AMBULANCES WITHOUT ANY DOCTOR ??!! 


This is Dr, Mailliez statement to the Inquest 13. november 07: 21.17:: We don´t have any paramedics in France. The ambulances belonning to the SAMU and the ambulances belonning to the firemen brigade are exactly the same with AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN ON BOARD and a driver and a nurse and the same kind of equipment". 

Dr, Mailliez lied concerning the location of the crash - this parisian emergency doctor didnt know he was in the Alma Tunnel: Dr, Frederic Mailliez 31. august 97 12:26 a.m. Transcript call to the Paris Fire Sevice ( not the SAMU ? ) read out on 13. Nov 07.70.22. " 

Station Fire Brigade, Hello.
Caller Dr, Mailliez, There has been an accident with at least three people seriously injured, but I am not sure where I am exactely. It´s on the embankment.
Station. You are on the Alma Brigde, arent you,by the Place de la Concorde ?
Caller: it´s before that, before.
Station: Before it ?

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

On 31 august 1997, the Queen welcomed the dead princess Diana back into the Royal fold. Not only did she authorise the immidiate use of Levertons, the Royal undertakers, but she also ordered the use of the Royal Standard to be placed on the coffin inside the Paris hospital. Then to further confirm this in the minds of the public,she despacthed her son Charles to Paris to accompany Diana´s body back to London. This was never about Diana´s wishes but the Queen agenda to control Diana´s dead body. Why was it important to Balmoral that the embalming be carried out in France ? The French company, PFG, has been ordered via Kenyons to do the embalming. But as a precautionary messaure, the Royal Funeral directors, Levertons, also had been told to make sure Diana was embalmed before bringing her back to the UK. Princess Diana, was not at the time of her death, a member of the Royal Family. 

The Queen reinstated Diana as a Royal so she could take control over her dead body. This allowed her to control the UK post-mortem and the samples taken and the later Inquest. These actions allowed the royal coronar, John Burton, to illegally take control of Diana´s body as soon as it arrived back in the UK. The legal process was for the body to be controlled by the coronar in the area of her anticipated burial, Althorp as decided by the Spencer family - that was the coronar of Nothhamptonshire.

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

The decision to bring Princess Diana to La Pitie Salpetriere Hospital was evidently made by the senior French government officials on the spot, Paris Police Chief Massoni and Interior Minister Chevenement. Massoni was in the tunnel, and Chevenement was already at La Pitie Salpetriere, in phone contact with the rescue crew in the tunnel. Yet, there are five other hospitals closer to the crash site, all with advanced emergency capabilities! 

Every political figure who is in a car crash or is injured is taken to the Val de Grace. Not only was Princess Diana not brought to Val de Grace. She was not brought to Cochin Hospital, the Hotel Dieu, Lariboisiere, or the private American Hospital – all of which were closer than La Pitie Salpetriere, and all of which had qualified personnel and emergency facilities to repair the damaged arteries.

One highly respected French doctor who specializes in emergency response, told EIR, in an exclusive interview, that Princess Diana should have been taken to the Val de Grace, “which is much closer than La Pitie. That is a military hospital.

Still, French authorities had found time to summon French politicians, police and British ambassador Sir Michael Jay to the hospital prior to the arrival of the ambulance. Inexplicably, one hour and forty six minutes elapsed between the time of the crash and the arrival of the ambulance at the hospital.

It implies that a massive cover up was perpetrated in order to conceal the fact that Diana was assassinated. If this was indeed the case, can we not think the unthinkable and inquire whether the official claim that Diana died from a ruptured pulmonary vein is totally false and that Diana only sustained minor injuries in the crash, but was murdered either in transit to the hospital, or subsequently in the hospital ?

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

It could be significant that in 1998 - the year following the Diana crash - the criminal Justice Act was passed. It appears to extend the rights of MI6 officers: There is no criminal liability for offences committed outside the UK if the person is " acting on behalf of, or holding office under, the Crown. No mention there of a requirment for the Foreign Secretary. 

The 1994 Intelligence Service Act indicates that MI6 officers or agents are not liable if the illegal act has the Foreign Secretary´s authorisation

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

On the morning of 17 October 2007, a statement given to the French investigation by Thierry Orban, a photographic reporter, was read out to the inquest. Referring to the ambulance carrying Princess Diana, Orban stated: "I then followed the ambulance, preceded by motorcyclists and followed by a police car which kept us at a distance. After the Pont d'Austerlitz, opposite the Natural History Museum, the ambulance stopped, the driver got out hurriedly and got into the back. That was when I took the only photo of the ambulance, which is in any case blurred. It was rocking, as if they were doing a cardiac massage" (12.25, 13.1-8). This stoppage occurred within 500 metres of the hospital gates!


The ambulance driver Michel Massebeuf s statement to the French investigation was read to the inquest on the morning of 14 November. He described what happened: "However, in front of the Jardin des Plantes, the doctor [Martino] asked me to stop. We stopped for about five-ten minutes ?, in order for him to be able to provide treatment that required a complete absence of movement" (23.15-20).

In his statement to Operation Paget, Dr Martino, who was inside the ambulance, explained the situation: "I had the vehicle stopped in order to re-examine the Princess... I did not do any cardiac massage at that moment but it is not easy to do cardiac massage or resuscitation with a vehicle moving" (Report, p. 515). ???!!!
Why did Thierry Orban witness a rocking ambulance if there was no cardiac massage taking place and "complete absence of movement" was required ? This question was not put to Dr Martino when he was cross-examined on the afternoon of 24 January 2008.
The statements by Thierry Orban and Michel Massebeuf were both inexplicably omitted from the Paget Report. Also, it is not known why Orban and Massebeuf were not cross-examined during this inquest.

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

Sue Read, Investigation Editor, Daily Mail: 17 Jun 06 Article:


"After delievring his People´s Princess tribute, Tony Blair returned to London to recieve Diana´s body at Norholt airport at 5pm on the Sunday. "The Prime Minister´s wife and thier three children were put on a scheduled British Midland flight from Teewside airport at tea-time for them to return to Downing Street. Normally, the Prime Minister would have travelled with them. But instead he boarded an RAF plane piloted by a crew based in Scotland which had flown to Teeside. Wayting on the tarmac for Mr Blair was Mr Y ( one of the security staff on duty at Blairs Sedgefield constituency ) Idly chatting to the co.pilot, he was told something very strange" The co-pilot asked him: What´s really going on ? We´ve been on stand-by in Scotland since 5.pm. on friday ( August 29 )waiting to make this flight to Norholt with the Prime Minister". Tony Blair had prior knowlegde of the Paris assassination

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

Lord Justice Scott Baker is seriously corrupt.


The jury - who were expected to reach a verdict on the cause of the deaths - were prevented from seeing the UK post-mortem and toxicology reports for both Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed.

Out of 23 documents connected to the post-mortem of Princess Diana, the inquest jury got to see just 2, and they heard evidence from only 3 of 14 key witnesses. 100 documents were withheld from the inquest jury by Lord Justice Scott Baker and a further 400 items of vital evidence was concealed from his own jury. The withheld documentation is so critical to the case that it calls into question whether the jury were actually in a position to achieve an informed verdict.

the original official police statements of French experts Professor Dominique Lecomte and Dr Gilbert Pépin were never heard by the Inquest Jury.

Both of these crucial witnesses refused to appear at the London inquest. Judge Baker had those statements but failed to have them read out!!!!!

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

June 1992: Andrew Morton Book.

August 1992: Squidygate tapes.

Consequence : Ostracised by the Royal family, travel and other restrictions , enforced formal separation. WAG is set up and holds first meeting.

November 1995: Panorama interview.
Consequence : Removal from Royal family, Loss of HRH Title ; formal divorce.

January to August 1997: Anti-Landmine Campaigne.
July to August 1997 : Mohammed Holy day St. Tropez, plans for Muhammed - Diana joint Hospice Venture, relationship with Dodi.

Consequence:
Crash in the Alma Tunnel.

Following the 1996 Charles - Diana divorce the Queen had run out of legal options in dealing with Princess Diana´s behaviour.

Richard Dearlove, David Spedding and Sherad Cowper-Coles, orchestrated the plot to assassinate Princess Diana. Make no mistake, Catherine Mayer

MI6 carried out the assassinations in conjunction with the CIA and French intelligence agencies, DGSE abnd DST.  There was a major coverup at the Inquest around the nature of the WAG - Hunt Davis and Fellowes ( the son of a bitch), the only royal witnesses heard, both lied about this. Robert Fellowes was present in Paris on 30 august 1997. 

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

I am 100% confident of MI6 involvement in the assassination of Princess Diana.

British Intelligence, MI6, MI5, SAS, have been involved in a long list of assassination plots bewteen 1942 - 1997. MI6 was directly involved in two high level assassination plots - Saddam Hussein and Muoammar Gaddifi in the 18 months leading up to the Paris crash. There was a concerted interest at the Inquest to shut down any discussion on MI6 involvement in Landmines.

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

MI6 obfuscate, lie, hold back information, refuse to release it until they are absolutely forced to years and decades down the road. They are their own worst enemies in providing information to the public.They create the groundwork for conspiracy theories because they refuse to extradite the information necessary for the public to reach an informed verdict. Their self-admitted concept of deniability,denying they are responsible for events they are responsible for,indicates that MI6 are lying.

MI6 claim that assassinations are something they do not countenance and at the same time, Mr. Fishwick (MI6) makes this statement to Mr. Mansfield( AL-Fayed Lawyer ) at the Inquest 26.2.08:189.4:

"I was worried about Milosevic taken power in Serbia and Yugoslavia so we ought to think about having a contingency plan to assassinat this guy".

But its against the ethos of the service to assassinate people ??. The MI6 has never assassinated anyone. Right


AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

"With this type of injury, time is of the essence......In the United States the delay in getting Princess Diana to the hospital for nearly two hours, would constitute gross malpractice. There is no excuse for it"

- Dr. Michael Baden, Chief Forensic Pathologist for New York State Police.

Bring this case to the International Court of Justice with the power to summon witnesses from the UK, US and France. It is impossible to achieve justice under UK,US or French jurisdiction.

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

What conspiracy theory, if you mean a conspiracy to commit murder, you are absolutely correct. 

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

When a Government want´s to cover something up they appoint an Inquest or they say, "We will wait until all the facts come out in Court" and surprise surprise, the Judge who is presiding over that Court, will be on the take, and he will make sure, that any relevant evidence that actually contradicts the official line, is not ADMITTED, and anybody who talks about it, can be held in contempt and thats how you hold a conspiracy together.

Despite two separate inquiries and a Royal Inquest the evidence still says the truth has been obscured for the past 15 years by a smoke-screen of lies, spies and cover-ups. The six month inquest obviously was never intended for the truth to be known. The legal proceedings left many serious allegations left unexplained. Extremely important evidence was kept from the jury. Even the coroner changed the evidence in his summing up so that the jury could not come to the conclusion that it was murder.

BUT THERE IS NO COVERUP. 






AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

To Catherine Meyer.

The numerous anomalies surrounding the crash and the eagerness by both the investigative authorities and the news media to solely blame the hapless Henry Paul, for the incidence, strongly suggests the occurrance of a massive coverup. Murder, criminal acts can be easily coverup if they are conducted on behalf of the establishment. You are part of this establishment. Your claims are undocumented and unsubstantiated allegations without content and reason, its pure speculation, with the soul purpose of denigrating Princess Diana. 

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

To Catherine Meyer. 

You cannot suggest a contradicting position without subjecting the counterpart to a character assassination and assault. Your condescending commentary on late princess Diana, is unequivocably unacceptable. As a Norwegen I am appalled. Your perspective is to disagree whether being confronted with verifiable facts or just common sense.  Anyone who contradicts the establishments distorted perspective surrounding the circumstances of Diana´s death, and your distorted view of reality, is a conspiracy nut. 

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

What conspiracy theory ? 

The only conspiracy theory as far as I am concerned is calling Diana´s death an accident. This was no accident but a sophisticated, premeditated murder not a combined aggravated, pre-ordered harassment by the paparazzi and others........it was not manslaughter but a premeditated murder conspiracy by a sophisticated vehicular homicide attack ordered by the House of Windsor. 

The murder of Diana shows the biggest cover-up in modern history of the biggest assassination of perhaps the most loved and respected person in the world. 

In 1995, Princess Diana went on national TV, it was the most widely watched show in Britain, saying that Prince Charles was unqualified to become King, launching an attack on the House of Windsor, that struck a cord among many people in Britain, the news commentators and the press in general basically said, "off with her head", so to say that there is absolutely no conceivable motive in the world to assassinate Diana is in my mind absurd. 

MartinWeston
MartinWeston

Has everyone forgotten that days before her death, she taunted the press while holidaying in Sardinia saying she was soon going to make an "announcement". The press was ripping her to shreds at the time - and suddenly she was dead. Does no-one else remember this?

It's interesting that people really believe that she couldn't possibly have been murdered. In every country around the world except Britain people believe she was murdered.

 


AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

If the House of Windsor is an any way implicated in the murder of Princess Diana, the World will never know the Truth.

People who debunk Masonic or Illuminati conspiracies obviously have no conception of the manner in which major institutions have been infiltrated at the top by senior Masons. We must understand the connection between the Masonry and Illuminati,who orchestrated Diana´s death,Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, instigated the resolution of the Diana problem,and some point the finger solely at the House of Windsor. We must understand the connection between the Windsors,the Illuminati and Freemasonry. 

ShawnArscott
ShawnArscott

Royals have been murdering one another for centuries - all the clues point in this direction. Do we really believe we know the truth about what the royals are up to? Anyone that has ill-gotten wealth and power is corrupt. The royal family is no different. Diana had good qualities - she used her position to try and do good - but people in power are in power only because they are no good. Time to acknowledge the truth and rise above money and power by blood line. Living a good life is the only way to achieve "authentic" power and self-respect. We can all learn from the tragedy of Diana's untimely death.

PamelaValemont
PamelaValemont

Well, there have been some interesting views expressed here below mine...............anyway.............it has been reported that this evidence was passed to police in 2011. It is not new news. But what has transpired recently (and has had a lot of media coverage, thereby forcing pressure on the MET to release this information publicly), is this. Evidently, Danny Nightingale (ex-SAS) and another soldier shared digs. They both were arrested for having in their possession weaponry. It may have been to safeguard themselves from harm because they knew too much. However, the reason the weaponry was discovered was because Nightingale's roommate was threatening his ex-wife, whom he had told that the SAS was responsible for the death of Diana and Dodi. No wonder his wife left him. The ex-parents-in-law of this man were so afraid for their daughter's life they reported their former son-in-law's admission about the SAS involvement in a conspiracy to murder Diana. What hope they said, have we of saving our daughter?  If he could possibly be involved in murdering her, how would our daughter fare? The house was searched, the weapons discovered, and the men charged as a result. He may have been shooting his mouth off, but I think not. I hope this time they conduct the inquest properly and do not allow themselves to be intimidated into suppressing the outcome. This new allegation accords exactly with my findings released in my book published some time ago: The Bible Code, Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed, on Lulu, Amazon.

AbrahamYeshuratnam
AbrahamYeshuratnam

There is no grain of truth in the claim that the British establishment masterminded Diana's murder. If Sherlock Holmes investigates this case, he will point out there was a suicide pact in the death of Diana. Diana had expressed that she was not prepared to marry Dodi, even though he was kept as a boy friend. She was also not pregnant to disprove Dodi's father's claim that the British didn't want a Muslim heir.. In all appearances, it was a suicide pact between Dodi and his trusted driver to kill her in a crash. It is like suicide blasts in Muslim countries, it was a suicide crash. Dodi didn't ask the driver to slow down the car. The alleged paparazzi hunt was not proved, for there was no paparazzi to be found on the crime spot. . Did the Scotland Yard visit the driver's house to assess his wealth after this crash? Holmes would have detected a suicide pact for the cause of Diana's death

elocutionist
elocutionist

THE TRUTH: riled and panic-stricken with unfounded fear, Diana hounded the driver to evade the pursuers, whom she imagined to be killers-- and her driver, intoxicated and clumsy, demanded too much of his reflexes-- thus ironically, her paranoia of being killed led to her death.  This is one of many reasons why calmness, forgiveness, and giving the benefit of the doubt are important to practice, in pulling us above the personal demons of darks fears and hatred, into a safer and better world.  

Jan7
Jan7

if there is nothing to hide then why was keith allen documentary banned in the UK.

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

@MartinWeston Corruption at Scotland Yard shows that Lord John Stevens, Lord Paul Condon and Sir David Veness colluded and lied repeatedly during their extensive inquest cross-examinations. Stevens presided over one of the largest sham investigations in the history of British policing, Operation Paget. An operation that the public believed was designed to investigate the Paris crash was instead used to cover up the truth of what occurred protecting the perpetrators of the assassination of Princess Diana.


AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

@MartinWeston

I am being censored. But all I can say is this:  

When a Government want´s to cover something up they appoint an Inquest or they say, "We will wait until all the facts come out in Court" and surprise surprise, the Judge who is presiding over that Court, will be on the take, and he will make sure, that any relevant evidence that actually contradicts the official line, is not ADMITTED, and anybody who talks about it, can be held in contempt and thats how you hold a conspiracy together.

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

@MartinWeston

The Paparazzi angel is interesting. 

Remember the verdict, "unlawful killing = grossly negligent driving of the FOLLOWING vehicles and of the Mercedes" ?

The reason that the description is "following vehicles" is because these vehicles remain unidentified. It is therefore very surprising that in virtually every media report describing the jury verdict, the words "following vehicles" have been replaced by the word "paparazzi". There is actually no evidence which indicates that these vehicles were in fact driven by paparazzi.

It is to the shame of both the French and British inquiries that, after ten years of "thorough" investigation, none of these motorbikes has been identified.

There are also motorbikes—probably the same ones—that were seen fleeing the crash scene, and cars including the white Fiat Uno that were witnessed fleeing after the crash. The reality is that the police on both sides of the Channel have only ever officially identified one vehicle in this entire case, and that is the crashed Mercedes S280.

It is evident that if these photos of Diana and Dodi's final moments before the crash had been taken by paparazzi, then they would be worth millions of pounds and somehow they would have surfaced after the crash—whether in newspapers, TV or over the Internet. But no such photos have ever been published. SO WHERE ARE THESE PHOTOS ?

It is quite impossible for any of the motorbikes surrounding or closely pursuing the Mercedes as it entered the Alma Tunnel to have carried paparazzi. Instead, the motorbikes were unidentified— which is why they have been described in the jury's verdict simply as "the following vehicles. Who took these photos through the untinted windows of the Mercedes S280 on its final trip ?

The men on motorbikes were masquerading as paparazzi with the purpose of harming the occupants of the Mercedes, but hoping that blame would later be attributed to the paparazzi.

Is it not interesting, that there are no photographs showing the journey of the Mercedes before the collision ?

Where are these photographs ?



AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

@MartinWeston

In the days immediately following Princess Diana’s ‘accident’, media reports famously informed us that her car “crashed into a concrete pillar while overtaking another vehicle” (a white Fiat Uno). 

We were also told that the “speedometer was stuck at 120 mph”, a claim later proven conclusively incorrect when Mercedes engineers revealed the speedometer was designed to revert to zero on impact. The coverup is so massive that it is impossible to provide the evidence and bring it before a court. 

The Boston Brake Assassination technique is highly sophisticated and has been employed by the worlds intelligence agencies for decades.  A microchip transceiver, is fitted to the target vehicles on-board computer, allowing the vehicle to be controlled remotely. It can also control seatbelt functioning. With crashes like this one there are usually traces of how the driver tried to avoid crashing by steering away from the point of impact to rectify their mistake. Nothing of that can be seen here.

Mysteriously, no skid marks, either from the Mercedes or the Fiat Uno, were found at Dianas crash scene, suggesting that Henri Paul also failed to brake or make any kind of correctional manoeuvre as he ploughed headlong into the concrete pillar. No skid marks revealing any kind of braking or correctional manoeuvre were found. Henry Paul just ploughed headlong into the concrete pillar without trying to brake or make some other attempt to avoid the collision. Strange enough in itself.



AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

@MartinWeston

THANKYOU MARTIN WESTON. Here in Norway and also in Denmark, we definately believe, that the House of Windsor is implicated in Diana´s murder. Its pretty obvious that she was assassinated, but if the House of Windsor is implicated, the World will never know the truth. 

As a matter of fact, the socalled Paget - is completely equivalent to the Warren commission: Its a massive cover up. If you believe Diana´s death was an accident, you also believe that Kennedy died of natural causes. 

The Paget want´s us to believe, that it was just a dreadful series of concidences, yet in the end it has produced a report that is littered with flaws, omissions, errors and contradictions. The crash has all the aspect of a staged accident, so if it wasn´t one, why does it look like one ? - and so much that the Paget had to spend  three years, 832 pages and 3.69 mill pounds trying to prove that is wasn´t ?

The assassination technique from the 1980s (developed by the BRITISH SAS) nicknamed “The Boston Brakes” involves steering, braking and acceleration capability being taken over by remote control! In fact world famous explorer and former SAS officer, Sir Ranulph Fiennes did indeed confirm the relatively common use of this assassination method with particular reference to the death inEngland of one Major Michael Marman in a car accident that bears UNCANNY RESEMBLANCE to that of Princess Diana.

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

@ShawnArscott

Diana was murdered by the Monarchy.

In 1995, Princess Diana went on national TV, it was the most widely watched show in Britain, saying that Prince Charles was unqualified to become King, launching an attack on the House of Windsor, that struck a cord among many people in Britain, the news commentators and the press in general basically said, off with her head, so to say that there is absolutely no conceivable motive in the world to assassinate Diana is in my mind absurd

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

@ShawnArscottIf the House of Windsor is an any implicated in the murder of Diana, the World will never know the Truth.

People who debunk Masonic or Illuminati conspiracies obviously have no conception of the manner in which major institutions have been infiltrated at the top by senior Masons. We must understand the connection between the Masonry and Illuminati,who orchestrated Diana´s death,Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, instigated the resolution of the Diana problem,and some point the finger solely at the House of Windsor. We must understand the connection between the Windsors,the Illuminati and Freemasonry

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

@PamelaValemont

The murder of Diana shows the biggest cover-up in modern history of the biggest assassination of perhaps the most loved and respected person in the world.

The facts, documents and verified evidence can be found in investigative journalist John Morgan's books on the Inquest, particulary the Paris-London Connection from 2012. The Queen wanted Diana assassinated,Prince Phillip ordered it, and it was executed by the British MI6, the French DGSE and the US CIA. 

This was no accident but a sophisticated, premeditated murder not a combined aggravated, pre-ordered harassment by the paparazzi and others........it was NOT manslaughter but a premeditated murder conspiracy by a sophisticated vehicular homicide attack orederd by Lizzy.

Paparazzi had nothing to do with it. The men on motorbikes were masquerading as paparazzi with the purpose of harming the occupants of the Mercedes, but hoping that blame would later be attributed to the paparazzi. 

In 1995, Princess Diana went on national TV, it was the most widely watched show in Britain, saying that Prince Charles was unqualified to become King, launching an attack on the House of Windsor, that struck a cord among many people in Britain, the news commentators and the press in general basically said, off with her head, so to say that there is absolutely no conceivable motive in the world to assassinate Diana is in my mind absurd.

People who debunk Masonic or Illuminati conspiracies obviously have no conception of the manner in which major institutions have been infiltrated at the top by senior Masons.We must understand the connection between the Masonry and Illuminati, who orchestrated Diana´s death, Prince Philip,Duke of Edinburgh, instigated the resolution of the Diana problem, and some point the finger solely at the House of Windsor. Understand the connection between the Windsors, the Illuminati and Freemasonry. Murder on behalf of the establishment can easely be covered up.


AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

@PamelaValemont

Diana was murdered by the Monarchy.

In 1995, Princess Diana went on national TV, it was the most widely watched show in Britain, saying that Prince Charles was unqualified to become King, launching an attack on the House of Windsor, that struck a cord among many people in Britain, the news commentators and the press in general basically said, off with her head, so to say that there is absolutely no conceivable motive in the world to assassinate Diana is in my mind absurd.

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

@AbrahamYeshuratnam

Really ?

In 1995, Princess Diana went on national TV, it was the most widely watched show in Britain, saying that Prince Charles was unqualified to become King, launching an attack on the House of Windsor, that struck a cord among many people in Britain, the news commentators and the press in general basically said, off with her head, so to say that there is absolutely no conceivable motive in the world to assassinate Diana is in my mind absurd.


AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

@elocutionist 


Lies. BAC 1.74% combined with a carbon monoxide level if 20.7% would have rendered Henry Paul unconscious.

The legitimate paparazzi had nothing to do with the assassination of Princess Diana. It was MI6 motorcylists masquerading as the paparazzi that chased Princess Diana in the Alma tunnel. All the legitimate paparazzi can be accounted for at the time of the impact. None of them were in the Alma tunnel. 

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

@Jan7

The murder of Diana shows the biggest cover-up in modern history of the biggest assassination of perhaps the most loved and respected person in the world.

The facts, documents and verified evidence can be found in investigative journalist John Morgan's books on the Inquest, particulary the Paris-London Connection from 2012. The Queen wanted to get rid of Diana, Prince Phillip instigated the resolution,  and it was executed by the British MI6, the French DGSE and the US CIA. 

AugusteJeanFelixPiccard
AugusteJeanFelixPiccard

@Jan7

Murder on behalf of the establishment can easaly be covered up. 

Diana was murdered by the Monarchy.

In 1995, Princess Diana went on national TV, it was the most widely watched show in Britain, saying that Prince Charles was unqualified to become King, launching an attack on the House of Windsor, that struck a cord among many people in Britain, the news commentators and the press in general basically said, off with her head, so to say that there is absolutely no conceivable motive in the world to assassinate Diana is in my mind absurd. 

This was no accident but a sophisticated, premeditated murder not a combined aggravated, pre-ordered harassment by the paparazzi and others........it was not manslaughter but a premeditated murder conspiracy by a sophisticated vehicular homicide attack orederd by Lizzy.

Paparazzi had nothing to do with it. The men on motorbikes were masquerading as paparazzi with the purpose of harming the occupants of the Mercedes, but hoping that blame would later be attributed to the paparazzi

PamelaValemont
PamelaValemont

@AugusteJeanFelixPiccard @PamelaValemont Thanks for your reply. You obviously haven't read my book. Not much sense shooting your mouth off if you don't know what I have said in it, is there? The Bible Code Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed. Lulu Amazon iBookstore Nook cheapest way to go is ebook of course.