In South Sudan, South Korean Peacekeepers Solicit Ammo From Bitter Rivals Japan

South Korean troops request 10,000 rounds of 5.56-mm ammunition despite an increasingly fractious relationship between East Asian neighbors

  • Share
  • Read Later
James Akena / Reuters

South Sudanese soldiers hold their weapons as they ride on a truck in Bor, north of the capital Juba, on Dec. 25, 2013

Anyone who appreciates irony can give a shout-out to South Korea, which has asked for thousands of rounds of assault-rifle ammunition for its peacekeepers in South Sudan — from, of all people, the Japanese. The request comes amid growing violence in one of Africa’s poorest countries, and a bitter political dispute between the East Asian rivals.

South Korea has long accused Japan of failing to face up to its militarist past, and on Thursday condemned a visit by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to a shrine in Tokyo linked to Japan’s wartime era.

About 280 South Korean peacekeepers are stationed at a U.N. base in South Sudan’s Jonglei state, where thousands of civilians have sought shelter as fighting between rival ethnic groups threatens to grow into full civil war.

(MORE: Japan’s Hawkish PM Abe Visits Controversial Shrine That Honors War Criminals)

Three Indian peacekeepers were killed in an ambush in the region last week, and four U.S. Navy SEALs were wounded during an evacuation mission. The U.N. Security Council has approved an emergency plan to send an additional 5,000 peacekeepers to South Sudan.

Although the South Korean troops have not been drawn into the fighting yet, they forwarded a request on Sunday for 10,000 rounds of 5.56-mm ammunition. As it turns out, the only other peacekeepers in South Sudan who use the same type of ammunition are a contingent from Japan.

It was an awkward request for both sides. The two countries are engaged in a bitter feud over territorial claims and other issues related to Japan’s colonial and wartime occupation of the Korean Peninsula. South Korean officials canceled the signing of an important intelligence-sharing agreement with Japan last year, and President Park Geun-hye has refused to meet with Japanese Prime Minister Abe since taking office 10 months ago.

The Abe administration wanted to approve the ammunition request, but faced domestic hurdles. Japan’s pacifist constitution, born of catastrophic defeat in World War II, bars the country from exporting or otherwise providing weapons and other war-related material to third parties.

(MORE: A Hawkish Japan Rediscovers Its Samurai Spirit)

Abe called an emergency meeting of Japan’s National Security Council on Sunday and a special meeting of his Cabinet the following day. The Cabinet produced a lengthy, lawyer-like decision approving the ammunition transfer, citing the threat to civilian refugees and South Korean troops, and the “urgency” of the situation. The ammo was shipped from the Japanese base on Monday.

“It is quite ironic that South Korea asked for Japan’s help, but taken as a whole it was a pragmatic and appropriate action on both sides,” says Narushige Michishita, director of the Security and International Studies Program at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies in Tokyo.

As it turns out, the 400 or so Japanese troops in South Sudan probably could afford to give up some of their ammo. By law, they are restricted to performing engineering and humanitarian missions, and are forbidden to engage in combat unless it is for self-defense. By arrangement with the U.N., security for the Japanese is provided by a contingent of peacekeepers from the Rwandan army. No word on whether they’ve asked for additional ammo.

MORE: How the World’s Newest Country Is Destroying Itself

6 comments
p56741944
p56741944

Korean PKO troop must fight with riots in front of them and their own country, which is saying arbitrary things in spite of the urgent circumstances.

TimmyO'Toole
TimmyO'Toole

Typical Korean logic ... "We hate your guts. Oh, by the way, can you help us?" 

K.Ishii
K.Ishii

What is wartime occupation of Korean peninsula ?

Really ? Did any action of occupation  occurr by Japanese Army ?

Did you know the history of Japan ?

Colonization or unification of Korea with Japan occurred before WW1 not 2.

In your articles , European and American including British

i can find many mistakes or ill-mindedness , disappointed very much.

Learn HISTORY ! Open minded !

History changes as time goes .

insuhk
insuhk

The Korean government needs to promptly clear the debt with bigger bullets. Japan is making a fuss too much to use this small case for their politics.

riceeisnicee
riceeisnicee

@K.Ishii I don't understand what your saying. Subsequently I don't think you know that militarism was a huge impact to millions of people including members of the South east Asian countries. If you have the same opinion as me, then hurrah! But if you don't then I suggest that you learn the facts of history in other textbooks that contain no lies and fiction. Yours, mine, our future is reflected by the actions our ancestors took hundreds of years ago in history books. Get your facts right,

Also, as a Korean myself, I do feel slightly skeptical by the actions the government has took recently. But taken from the recent case as prime minister Abe revering to the Yasukuni shrine has probably brought ends to the relationship of Korea and Japan in both economical, cultural, and political sectors